Comments on: Posers http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/ leahculver.com Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:38:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Lachlan Hardy http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-273 Lachlan Hardy Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:02:47 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-273 Awesome call! San Francisco isn't the place where they're spreading like weeds. I think that's a term that'll be in use a lot in Sydney soon! Awesome call! San Francisco isn’t the place where they’re spreading like weeds. I think that’s a term that’ll be in use a lot in Sydney soon!

]]> By: Dirty Bird http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-272 Dirty Bird Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:34:09 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-272 True players figure out how to get rich off of the posers. Pro skaters make a lot more money than most Web 2.0 droids. True players figure out how to get rich off of the posers. Pro skaters make a lot more money than most Web 2.0 droids.

]]> By: Ted R. http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-271 Ted R. Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:50:09 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-271 Poser2.0 The funny thing is that this time (versus their onslaught on the community in late 90s) is that we can blog, video, tag, comment and taunt the heck out of them. We should come up with a tag for just this type of person/behavior. Poser20, allpantnotrouser, shapeshifter? Poser2.0

The funny thing is that this time (versus their onslaught on the community in late 90s) is that we can blog, video, tag, comment and taunt the heck out of them.

We should come up with a tag for just this type of person/behavior. Poser20, allpantnotrouser, shapeshifter?

]]> By: Curt http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-270 Curt Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:47:36 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-270 Any time you get a "paradigm-shifting...shazbot" you get people preaching at the streetcorners. But the world has an irritating habit of remaining in existence, and "Web 2.0" and all the rest of it is no more the sole future than Imagism was destined to take over poetry. Engage your critical faculties, peoples. Any time you get a “paradigm-shifting…shazbot” you get people preaching at the streetcorners. But the world has an irritating habit of remaining in existence, and “Web 2.0″ and all the rest of it is no more the sole future than Imagism was destined to take over poetry. Engage your critical faculties, peoples.

]]> By: Archfear http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-269 Archfear Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:02:52 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-269 Posers definitely ruled Web 1.0. Any fool with a computer course under their belt was earning a ridiculous salary while playing foosball and waiting for the bubble to burst. At least there are less of them this time around. Posers definitely ruled Web 1.0. Any fool with a computer course under their belt was earning a ridiculous salary while playing foosball and waiting for the bubble to burst. At least there are less of them this time around.

]]> By: ben brown http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-268 ben brown Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:17:33 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-268 [this is good] [this is good]

]]> By: benji http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-267 benji Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:11:08 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-267 On the real flex, these haters need to recognize. When I see a web2.0 poser I just straight punch them in the fucking face. On the real flex, these haters need to recognize.

When I see a web2.0 poser I just straight punch them in the fucking face.

]]> By: ale/pepino http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-266 ale/pepino Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:07:59 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-266 Well, talking about Web 2.0 instead of talking about defined technology standards and usability issues can be seen as a pose, too. I like it when things are called their name. And that's what you do in this post. Thank you! Well, talking about Web 2.0 instead of talking about defined technology standards and usability issues can be seen as a pose, too. I like it when things are called their name.

And that’s what you do in this post. Thank you!

]]> By: MikeCa http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-265 MikeCa Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:33:07 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-265 1. posers emulate players 2. players resent posers 3. players innovate, distancing from posers therefore, posers drive innovation 1. posers emulate players
2. players resent posers
3. players innovate, distancing from posers

therefore, posers drive innovation

]]> By: Bert Beepers http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-264 Bert Beepers Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:31:24 +0000 http://leahculver.com/2007/02/14/posers/#comment-264 Oh. My. God. So true. *cough*B. Solis/Bub.blicio.us*cough* "Covering the social economy"!? What bullshit. Oh. My. God. So true.

*cough*B. Solis/Bub.blicio.us*cough*
“Covering the social economy”!? What bullshit.

]]>